Archive for the ‘articles’ Category

Mike Caro poker word is Expand

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Sure, I’m the one who creates solid guidelines governing which poker hands you can play profitably. That’s me. But, even though I stress these standards that tell you which hands to call with, raise with, and fold with in which positions under which circumstances, I don’t usually stick to them myself.

I expand these standards and define more hands as playable. How come?

Well, today I’m going to tell you why that’s so. If you’re still an average player or a beginner, I want you seldom to stray from a predetermined, conservative set of standards. But you still need to understand what I’m about to say for the future. And if you’re already a sophisticated poker player, please pay particular attention.

This is the transcript of one of my lectures…

Winning by playing hands you “shouldn’t”

One thing I teach beginning players is to stick to a rigid set of standards. Don’t vary from them. These beginning standards are necessarily tight, because I don’t want students who are unfamiliar with the subtleties of poker to encounter difficult situations that may cost them money.

Fine. But as you progress as a player, as you begin to grasp the subtleties, something almost the opposite happens. Instead of staying away from danger by avoiding hands that require more finesse, you play these hands and the beginning players, inexperienced players, and poor players all lose money to you on the very hands that they themselves cannot profitably play. You play and win with the same hands they lose with.

Find more

So one of the key secrets to mastering poker isn’t to just play those same basic hands for more profit, it’s to find more hands that you can play profitably. The truth is, you can play more hands profitably when you are able to outplay opponents on later betting rounds. Once you develop a good understanding of later-round play, you can play hands that you used to think were unprofitable – and you used to be right.

What if you can’t outplay opponents on the betting sequences after you enter the pot – if you don’t know when to bet, when not to bet, when to call, and when to raise with more certainty than your opponents? Then you must stick to a rigid and conservative set of starting hands to have any hope of winning. That’s the key. That’s why I teach beginners to only play premium hands.

If they only enter pots with these premium hands, then they’ll average a profit on all the hands they play, even if their understanding of when to bet, call, raise, and fold on later rounds is inferior. Those select hands are just too powerful to lose money by playing. But that doesn’t guarantee them that they’ll win overall.

Finding hands

You see, every hand you don’t play costs money. That’s obvious, because you’re anteing or making blind bets and losing that money if you never play a hand. So, you have to find enough hands to play to overcome the cost of the antes or blinds. Most beginners can’t do that, even if they stick to just their most powerful hands, because there aren’t enough of them, and because they aren’t getting the same value from these rare strong hands that a skilled professional would.

Also, some beginners can’t even make money with hands that are only semi-strong, but not premium. That’s because, even average opponents outplay them.

So, beginners – if they try as hard as they can – should only play premium starting hands or those where they got into the pot cheaply or for free and found themselves with excellent chances to make straights or flushes – or managed to make strong pairs or better. They should fold on early betting rounds when their hands would otherwise figure to be about break-even or slightly profitable, because they’ll be outplayed and these hands will lose money under their control.

So, you can see how very dismal poker can be for beginners. They can’t play many hands, and because they can’t hold their own against most opponents, they must forego the opportunities to make profit with hands of secondary strength. It’s a mess. They don’t even make as much money as they should when they do play premium hands.

Average and world-class players

What about average players. Well, they can play more hands, because they won’t get beat up as badly on later betting rounds.

And what about truly world-class players? Ah, now listen closely. Truly world-class players can enter pots with hands that are theoretically losers. In other words, if I simulate poker on a computer and give everyone the same degree of skill, there will be hands that are clearly not playable.

But in non-raked games, meaning home games or games where the casino charges rent by the hour or half hour, a really strong player can enter pots with some of these substandard hands. You won’t usually be able to do this in rake games, because the cost of the rake tends to swallow up the advantages gained from later round strategy.

But you can play some of these otherwise substandard hands in non-rake games. The theoretical loss in a medium limit game for playing one of those weak hands might be $2.

But, wait! If the player can out maneuver his opponents on subsequent betting rounds while they make mistakes, there may be $4 worth of value in pursuing the later betting rounds. That means a hand that would lose $2 if everyone played equally or, similarly, when played by an average player can win $2 under control of a world-class player. And a hand that might lose $6 when played by a weak or beginning player, can win $2 through expert play. Those dollar amounts are just used to convey a point and aren’t meant to be precise.

Dollar expectation

So, what does this mean? It means that a beginning poker player can’t play a specific hand because it loses $6. An average player can’t play that hand because it loses $2. However, a world-class player should play that same hand, because it wins $2.

Am I saying that strong players can play more pots? Absolutely! And you’ve always heard that strong players play tighter than weak players, right? Well, OK, now don’t get confused. Strong players do usually play tighter than weak players – as far as starting hand selection goes. But that’s only because many weak players enter pots that they have no business playing. They play hands that even the world-class players couldn’t make profit from by using correct strategy on the later rounds.

So, yes, world-class players do tend to play fewer hands than weak opponents. But if the weak opponents were trying to win, then they’d have to play much tighter than the world-class opponents, because they wouldn’t know what to do on later betting rounds.

Simple fact

The simple fact is, the best players can enter pots with hands that would be theoretically unprofitable in games where everyone has their same skill. The extra skill allows them to play more hands. So, you shouldn’t criticize them for playing hands you think are losing, because in their control, these hands might win.

The better you are, the more hands you can play profitably. I know that runs contrary to the notion that the best players have the most discipline and play the tightest, but it’s the truth and you need to know it.

This is “The Mad Genius of Poker” Mike Caro and that’s my secret today. — MC

You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament.

When Good Poker Advice is Bad

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Poker tip from the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro

1. In poker, you need to adapt. Whether advice is good or bad for a particular poker situation depends on (1) your opponents, (2) your image, and (3) your bankroll. Some proven plays may not be good ones against certain opponents. For instance, I advocate making many “value bets” at high risk when you’re only a slight money favorite. When you do this, you’re pressing your advantage to extract every possible penny of profit. Weaker players will not always press their advantages, and - worse - they will act aggressively with some hands that don’t warrant a bet or a raise. That costs them money. But if you do know that a value bet is profitable (and it isn’t really a value bet otherwise), I believe that you should bet. OK, but beware. If your image is not correctly suspicious, you’re not going to get many calls, and you often shouldn’t bet medium-strong hands for value. And if your bankroll is too limited, you should forego some aggressive plays targeted at small profit but involving great risk. That way, you’ll hang on to your bankroll and can use those funds to make more money when you have bigger edges. In poker, you need the right tool for right now. A hammer may be a good tool for driving a nail into a shingle, but it’s not right for driving a meat thermometer into a roasting turkey. Today we’ll look at some of the good advice from the previous 37 weeks, and explain when it’s bad.

2. Betting second pair on the flop. I advise that often you can do this profitably in hold’em if (1) your foes are timid, (2) you have a big kicker, or (3) the top rank is small (all previously explained in other lectures). But don’t bet second-high board pair if your opponents look uninterested. If they’re acting, this monumental tell means that they’re waiting to pounce. And even if they’re not acting, you have little motive to bet. So, bet second pair often, yes. Don’t bet it against opponents who don’t seem to be paying attention.

3. Bet weak hands. On the last betting rounds, bet hopeless or nearly hopeless hands into opponents whose hands are apt to be equally bad. You’ll often win with that bet and avoid losing to slightly better hands in showdowns. This concept suggests that whenever you’re reasonably sure that neither you nor your opponent has a very strong hand, you’ll make more profit in the long run by betting than by checking and risking a showdown. But, consider your opponent. Don’t bet your weakest hands if you might be REbluffed. You won’t be able to call, assuming that your opponent doesn’t conspicuously overuse this tactic. So, try this play only against opponents with seemingly weak hands who are not aggressive or imaginative.

4. Be fun. If opponents enjoy playing with you, they’ll usually give you more of their money. But sometimes you can build an image that’s too carefree - and then your opponents may become inspired and play tighter and better, hoping that you’ll be their salvation. I’ve seen this happen many times. Opponents are losing and playing badly. You try to encourage them to continue by playing a few hands even worse. Usually this works, but beware. If you’re against opponents who do know how to play a strong conservative game, you might have just inspired them to come back to their senses - thinking that they can get even from you now. Remember, the object of a wild image is to get opponents to play loosely and carelessly, not tightly and selectively.

5. Tournament advertising. In a poker tournament, advertise before the limits increase. This gives you psychological value at a reduced price. But sometimes, advertising isn’t right at all in a tournament. If the increasing limits are going to cause your opponents to be bluffable in the next higher-limit round, you often should take advantage of that by maintaining a solid image now. Also, you need to have a full table when you bluff; otherwise, you’re paying for advertising that probably isn’t reaching a wide enough audience. And make sure that your table isn’t going to be the next one to break before you advertise. Otherwise, all of the people you’ve “set up” will be scattered around the tournament arena, and you’ll get little or no value for your advertising.

6. Benefits of a wild image. A wild and reckless image not only profits from more calls, it tends to discourage bluffs through intimidation. Players don’t like to bluff opponents who seem not to care about money. But sometimes, a fun-loving opponent will get caught up in your routine and will bluff a lot - just for fun. In this case, your image has enticed more bluffs from that opponent - and you should call more.

7. Playing against blind bets. You should tend to attack the blinds less when the players defending them are aggressive and unpredictable. “Tight and passive” are the best blinds to attack, for many reasons previously explained in my lectures. But, you sometimes should send a warning to aggressive and unpredictable foes on your left by raiding their blinds from late positions. Remember, these players to your left have a positional advantage over you on most hands, and you may diminish their will to maximize their positional advantage on other hands when they’re not the blinds. So, although the advice to be less aggressive in attacking blinds of opponents who defend them is valid, there’s also a time when you might want to attack those blinds, simply to make those opponents less aggressive in the future. Strange game, poker.-MC
You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament at Doyles Room.com.

Watch For Folded Arms

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

POKER TIP from Mad Genius Mike Caro  

One tell that I find quite profitable is folded arms.

When an opponent slumps or leans back in his chair and folds his arms between hands, he’s in defensive and patient mode. Don’t expect this player to suddenly get inspired and play a weak hand for the excitement.

When this player leans forward and decides to play, it’s almost always a legitimate hand.

The folded-arms type of player is content to lean back and wait. Don’t expect to see weak-starting-hands.

You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament at Doyles Room.com.

When To Hesitate

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

POKER TIP from Mad Genius Mike Caro  

In poker, the time to hesitate is when you really need more time to resolve a close decision. Often things will occur to you given a little extra time. Or, under the extra pressure, your opponent may provide you with a tell. You might occasionally also hesitate for deception, so that alert opponents can’t determine that your pause always means you have a close decision.

Also, sometimes when you make a final bet with a big hand, you’ll be more likely to be called if you don’t bet instantly. Well, if you don’t bet ALMOST instantly, I mean. Because both a bet delayed for a few extra seconds and an unreasonably quick one are apt to make your opponents suspicious and more likely to be called.

But, unless there’s a specific reason to hesitate, you should usually make all your bets, calls, and raises crisply and confidently — because this enhances your image and speeds up the game.

You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament at Doyles Room.com.

Adjusting to Wins and Losses.

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

POKER TIP from Mad Genius Mike Caro 

Many of your opponents will treat you differently when you’re winning than when you’re losing. That’s because they’re conscious of luck and fear you more when you’re “running lucky.” When this happens, everything is as it should be in the universe, and your opponents are easier to control. You can bet marginal hands for value that you wouldn’t be able to otherwise — because you’d be afraid that these same opponents would be inspired by your losses and would raise aggressively or play deceptively.

It’s true. When you’re winning, your foes are apt to be docile and well behaved, and this allows you to press every hand for maximum value without fearing that they’ll get maximum value for their hands, too. But, wait! What’s the best way to adjust, depending on whether you’re running good or bad? Simple. Most of your decisions in poker will be “borderline,” meaning that the decision isn’t especially clear.

Do this: When you’re conspicuously winning and faced with a borderline decision between checking and betting, bet… AND between calling and raising, raise.

But… when you’re conspicuously losing and faced with a borderline decision between checking and betting, check… AND between calling and raising, call. These adjustments works like magic, and they’re pure profit.

You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament at Doyles Room.com.

More Bad News For Hold’em Small Pairs In Early Seats

Friday, March 27th, 2009

POKER TIP from Mad Genius Mike Caro

As you may know, I teach that it’s usually wrong to call the big blind early with small pairs, such as 2-2, 3-3, and 4-4. Many things work against these hold ‘em hands, such as (1) you can make three of a kind and lose to a larger three-of-a-kind, (2) if you get lucky enough that your pair might matter, a bigger pair (or bigger two-pair when there’s a major pair on board and your second pair isn’t large enough) might beat you, and (3) two bigger pairs might show up on the board, leaving you with essentially no hand at all.

But if this argument — and the simulation of millions of hands which I’ve done by computer — doesn’t convince you, here’s some more bad news: You usually can afford to call a single raise after you call the blind with a small pair, but not a double raise. So, if you call, and there’s a raise, and then there’s a re-raise, you should usually fold. But in folding, you’re surrendering a first bet without any shot at the pot whatsoever.

When I talk to people who are trying to analyze whether these small pairs are profitable in an early position, they seldom mention the fact that you might have to throw the hand away without seeing the flop. So, even if you can argue that the small pair is a close decision without the forced-to-fold factor, it is not a close decision when that factor is correctly considered. Once again: Seldom play small pairs from an early position, unless you’re in a very loose game with very timid opponents who don’t raise aggressively AND you can outplay those opponents on later betting rounds.

You can chat and play with the “Mad Genius”, Mike Caro, every Wednesday night at 9:30pm ET in the Bounty Tournament at Doyles Room.com.

The G-Spot: Piece By Piece

Saturday, February 7th, 2009

By Tony Guerrera

Suppose you’re playing six-handed $100 buy-in no-limit hold’em. You’re dealt AH KS under the gun. You raise to $3. The button and the blinds call, making the pot $12 going into the flop. The flop is AD JS 3S. The blinds check to you, you bet pot, the button calls, and the blinds fold. The pot is $36, and the turn is the 9H.. You bet pot, and the button calls. The pot is $108. The river is the 2S. You go all-in for $49, and your opponent calls. Did you win this hand?

Probably not. Many players underestimate their opponents and assume they will call large, pot-sized bets with top pair and a weak kicker – or even a lesser pair. However, making large pot-sized pots is generally not the way to get value from top pair/top kicker (TPTK) against most opponents. If you have TPTK or an overpair, pot-sized bets generally constrain your opponents’ calling distributions to hands that all have you beaten.

Every Made Poker Hand Is Not a Double Up

If you make a bet that constrains your opponents’ calling distributions to hands that are all better than yours, then you will lose money in the long run when playing top pair or overpairs. And if you’re losing money with these hands, you’re a losing player. The key to getting value from your good (but vulnerable) hands is realizing that your goal isn’t to double up every time you’re in a pot.

Instead of making large pot-sized bets that constrain your opponents’ calling distributions and possibly leave you pot-committed, make bets that are smaller. Make bets that increase your opponents’ calling ranges substantially, so that the hands you’re trying to get value from are actually ahead of your opponents’ calling ranges. Also make bets that don’t leave you pot-committed when your opponents have you crushed.

You won’t double-up nearly as often, but you also won’t be getting stacked with TPTK and overpairs against players you’ve misjudged. And realize that you will be winning pots that are larger than average. Instead of making lots of large, discontinuous jumps, your stack will be something more like a tank that moves slowly (but surely) towards its destination.

When To Go For The Kill

Of course, it’s still important to seek opportunities to go for the kill. When you face opponents who will call pot-sized bets with very marginal holdings, recognize and capitalize appropriately. Also recognize situations when your opponents have very good hands that they will call substantially larger bets with. When you have your opponents beaten in these situations, make them pay – possibly by overbetting the pot.

Piece by piece will be your general mentality. But as always, keep your mind open!

Tony Guerrera is the author of Killer Poker By The Numbers and co-author of Killer Poker Shorthanded (with John Vorhaus).

Poker History

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Poker is sometimes referred to as the national card game of the United States of America, but it is also a popular game internationally and is played pretty much everywhere that cards are played. Poker in it’s present form is relatively new as games go, and its history has been highly debated.

The Persian game As Nas is perhaps one of it’s ancestors, but there’s not really any specific descriptions written down about As Nas before 1890, so this may not be the case at all, and may have come to though mostly because of being noted as similar in ‘The Complete Hoyle’ by R F Foster. There is evidence that a French game called Poque may have been played in the region where Poker is said to have originated, and it may be from here that it derived.

The name is likely to come from one of two places – either Poque (French) which itself is derived from the Germen Pochen meaning to brag as a bluff or to knock, or possibly from the Irish Poca meaning Pocket, although the games bearing these names are not as close in style to Poker as is the English game Brag - earlier known as Bragg which was decended from the game Brelan and involved a lot of bluffing. It is indeed entirely possible that Poker came about from an amalgamation of two or more of these different games and that all influenced it as it grew into the game we know now.

No matter where it originated from, for a time it was very much a rough game where people asked no quarter and gave no quarter, played by gamblers of tough origin and desire, a slow game full of thought and seriousness. In the twentieth century though, it became more acceptable socially and something that could be played by both sexes in the parlour for nominal stakes or even none at all. The laws and customs surrounding poker have kept up with the times, and today in the 21st century many people enjoy a game of poker either at home with friends, on the internet or in casinos, playing for stakes large or small, and seeing it as something to enjoy and have fun with.

It’s fascinating to remember that many phrases that we use in regular English and American today had their beginnings at the poker tables. Phrases such as ‘beats me’, ‘ace in the hole’, ‘call ones bluff’, and ‘pass the buck’ are all in use in modern every day life and conversation even by many people who have never played poker and are unaware of their origins.

Today various poker tournaments are broadcast on the internet and television including the World Series of Poker, and the World Poker Tour. Since 2003 major poker tournament fields have grown dramatically this is partly because of the increase in popularity of online satellite qualifier tournaments where the prize is an entry into a major world tournament and where players get the chance to play against world champions. Two noted World Series of Poker Champions who won their seats to the main event in this way are Chris Moneymaker and Greg Raymer.

2008 World Series of Poker Main Event

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

Copyright © 2008 Tom Howze

The 2008 World Series of Poker Main Event, which ran from July 3rd until November 10th, is now complete, with 22 year old Peter Eastgate as its new champion. Eastgate received over $9 million US dollars, a beautiful one-of-a-kind diamond bracelet with rubys and permanent fame in the WSOP record books as the youngest champion ever, surpassing Phil Hellmuth Jr. who was 24 years, 10 months and 5 days of age at the time of his Main Event victory in 1989. Eastgate hailing from Odense, Denmark, was 22 years, 10 months and 28 days old when he won the title, witnessed by millions watching the broadcast event on ESPN.

While the edited version of the Main Event condensed the time frame of play, highlighting the turning points between the players, there were still many facts that were not made known.

Final table play officially began at 11:08 am. The first day where 7 of the 9 would be eliminated ended 13 hours and 27 minutes later, at 12:35 am. For the heads-up, action started the next night at 10:34 PM and officially ended at 2:36 am. This means the 15 hours and 39 minutes it took to play became the longest in WSOP history.

When the names of the final table players were established and play stopped on July 15th, they each received $900,670. The balance of prize money was paid out as players were eliminated in November.

All who made the final table were guaranteed $900,670, but Harrah’s actually took it a step further. The $98,179 in interest accumulated on the $24,527,416 remaining pool money during the 117 day furlough was added to the amount for the top 8 finishers. For example, the $9,152,416 for first place was originally $9,119,517.

When the money was brought out two years ago, the weight caused the table holding the cash to collapse. This year officials made sure the money was placed on a reinforced table which was ideal because the $9,152,416 weighted an estimated 500 pounds!

When the tournament ended, Peter Eastgate had the entire 136,900,000 chips that were dealt out to the 6,844 players who began the event.

The prize pool for the Main Event was $64,431,779, making it the second-largest tournament prize pool in history.

Players from 124 nations and territories came to participate in the Main Event.

When Erick Lindgren accepted the award for Player of the Year on the night of the heads up, he ended his speech with a invitation from Doyle Brunson that a cash game was taking place afterwards once Eastgate and Demidov were done. Erick received a custom Harley Davidson motorcycle for his achievement.

On the night of the final table, two players were inducted into the Hall of Fame. They were Dewey Tomko and Henry Orenstein.

Outside of breaks and other recesses, it took Eastgate 80.9 hours to win the title. Play lasted 278 hands from start to finish.

When all was said and done with the Main Event, the 39th WSOP was the largest tournament in history. Cards were dealt to 58,720 players that entered into the 55 gold bracelet events. And that does not even include the WSOP Europe statistics! In total the entire 39th WSOP was so big, it required over 7,000 hours of taping with 40 cameras by ESPN just to get what was seen on television. And with a total prize pool of $180,676,248 that was awarded to players this WSOP season, fans across the planet were able to witness what has been deemed the richest event in the sporting realm.

About The Author:

Tom Howze is a webmaster of an Internet site that relates to the 2009 World Series of Poker events, updates and results news and Free Slot Machine Games.

Article Source: thePhantomWriters Article Submission Service

Play Money Poker vs Real Money Poker

Sunday, November 16th, 2008

By Chris McElroy

In this article on poker, I’m going to talk about people who enjoy playing poker at online poker websites, but who like to play for play money and some of the reasons they want to do so.

I play a lot of online poker. I play for real money, but also play poker for play money at a few different online poker websites. Playing Texas Holdem Poker is fun regardless of the money on the line or lack of it.

Whenever you go into any of the poker rooms, there are always people there who believe they are the best poker players since Wild Bill Hickok. But that is actually part of the fun of playing poker. The guy with the most poker chips, whether real or play, gets the bragging rights, no matter how lucky they may have gotten.

But in some of the play money poker rooms online you hear people say, “Well if you are such a good poker player, why don’t you play for real money?”

There are a lot of reasons for someone to play poker for play money. Here are some of them.

1. Practice makes perfect - It gives you a chance to explore strategies and experiment with them that you would never gamble real money on until you see how well they work. Believe it or not, there is some extremely good poker players in some of the play money rooms.

2. Non-Gamblers - Maybe the person loves to play poker but just doesn’t gamble. You can enjoy poker without gambling real money.

3. Learning - Playing poker for play money is a great way to learn how to play. Just like in practice makes perfect I mentioned above, some people are not advanced enough at poker to even have a strategy yet. Everyone has to start somewhere.

4. Some people play online poker to relax after a hard day at work or with the kids. They like the ability to chat to other players and treat online poker as a chatroom with the ability to play poker while they chat instead of a poker room where they can also chat.

5. Financial Reasons - It is never smart to “gamble the rent”, an old gambler’s advice goes. And its true. Maybe the person you are playing would be playing for real money if their circumstances were a little different.

The point to all of this? Give people a break. If you go into a play money room at an online poker website, do not assume that because someone is playing in a play money poker room that they are not a good poker player.

Be polite and make friends. You’ll find the play money poker game is a lot more fun with everyone chatting and joking around than being too competitive or insulting.

About the Author: Chris McElroy made a living playing pool and poker for years and still enjoys both as hobbies now and then. For more information about online poker visit Start Here For Poker

Source: www.isnare.com

Permanent Link: http://www.isnare.com/?aid=62783&ca=Recreation